patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

D161 Board Hires Barb Rains as District's New Superintendent

The board approves the hiring 5-1 amid criticism from the public and some board members that the position should have been posted and other candidates interviewed.

 

In an almost five-hour standing room-only meeting that included unanimously passing a property tax levy, outlining plans to eliminate inefficiencies in the district and sparring between members of the public and board members, the big news from Wednesday's meeting of the Summit Hill School District 161 board didn't come until the very end after members returned from an hour-and-a-half closed session.

That's when the board voted 5-1 to hire Barb Rains as the district's permanent superintendent, removing the interim label from the title she's held since former Superintendent Keith Pain resigned over the summer. Her contract begins immediately and will run through June 30, 2013, at a salary of $145,000, an increase of about $30,000 from her previous pay. Pain's salary as superintendent a the time he stepped down was $177,000.

"I'm very honored to be in this position," Rains said after the meeting. "We have a lot of decisions ahead of us that need to be made for the district."

READ: D161 Board Unanimously Passes $30M Tax Levy

Before serving as interim superintendent, Rains had been the district's human resources and public relations director since 2008. She worked in human resources and community relations for Orland School District 135 from 1991 to 2008, and was a high school teacher in Muncie, Ind. Rains earned her bachelor's and Master's degrees from Ball State University, and she has Type 75 Administrative Certificate from DePaul University and a certificate of advanced study in superintendency from Lewis University.

Although praising the work Rains has done as interim superintendent, some community and board members were critical of the hiring process, saying the position should have been posted and other candidates should have been interviewed. These objections were brought up at Tuesday night's board workshop discussing parent and teacher input on the hiring a new superintendent and were echoed Wednesday.

"I have to vote my conscience, I have to vote my heart when I'm up here, and I am disappointed that we are doing the hiring here without a search," said board member Sean William Doyle, who voted against the hiring but emphasized that it was not a reflection on Rains's qualifications.

"I don't know how the board can look the community in the eye and honestly say to them they found the best qualified candidate in the absence of a search," he added, receiving applause from the people still in attendance.

READ: D161 Board Members Sharply Divide Over Superintendent Hiring

Board Secretary Denise Lenz voted for the hiring, but she voiced her displeasure with not looking for other candidates.

"I don't agree with the process. I'm extremely upset over the process," she said. "If we're ever going to become a unified board it has to start now. ... I will vote with the consensus of the board because I don't have issues with the candidate. I just have issues with the process."

Some members of the public still in attendance at the end of the meeting blasted the board for not conducting a search for other candidates.

"On the Summit Hill website, you have positions posted for substitute lunch supervisors, lunch supervisors, substitute nurses, and yet you're not going to post for a superintendent position? That's ridiculous!" said Val Goetsch, vice president of Rogus Elementary School Community Organization, a parents group representing Dr. Julian Rogus Elementary School.

"That's all (parents) wanted was someone who was the best qualified candidate, and you didn't even give us the opportunity to show you made an effort to show that (Rains) was the best qualified candidate," she added. "And you did her a disservice because by not doing that now she's going to start with a tainted administration, and she's going to have half of the people in this district not support her."

READ: Budget, Superintendent or New Board Member: What's Most Important Issue for D161?

Board President Mary Kenny, Board Vice President Joy Murphy and board member Stacey Borgens defended hiring Rains without interviewing other candidates, saying they strongly believed in Rains's abilities and that the board wouldn't find another candidate who was as qualified and as intimately familiar with the district.

"We as a board have been working with Barb Rains for six months," Kenny said. "She's done a phenomenal job under very tough circumstances. And we have had, truly, input that has told us that she's doing a good job. It has come from the community. It has come from staff and it has come from board members."

Given the issues the district faces, time was of the essence, Kenny said, adding that the soonest a superintendent from outside the district would be July of next year. That loss of time would've been critical to the educational and financial decisions the board needs to make in the upcoming months, Kenny said.

"Barb has been in a six-month interview," Borgens said after the meeting. "You don't get that chance with outside candidates."

 

The hiring capped off a meeting that was punctuated with board members and the public going toe-to-toe over the superintendent hiring as well as the possibility that the board could shut down a school in order to make up for a $2.5 million shortfall in the 2012-2013 budget. The schools being considered for closing are either Arbury Hills School or Frankfort Square School.

During the meeting, Rains outlined some of the district's enrollment and classroom inefficiencies and discussed a timeline for addressing the budget issues. The board also agreed to form a committee of community members within the next week to help in this area.

What do you think of the hiring of Barb Rains as the new superintendent for D161? Tell us in the comments section.

Related Topics: Barb Rains, Hiring, Keith Pain, Summit Hill School District 161, Superintendent Search, and school board meetings

Outraged

6:56 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

The majority of the board acted in an unprofessional manner with blatant disregard for the wishes of community they were elected to serve. It worries me to think of what little effort they were willing to put in to the hiring of the new superintendent and makes me wonder their motive. Was it just plain laziness? Now we are faced with watching them fill a vacant board position as well as the prospect of closing schools. After witnessing the board's behavior for 2 consecutive evenings I shudder to think of what the future holds for our district. We as taxpayers owe it to our children and our community to stay involved and make sure the board lives up to their promise of forming a committee to look at the budget issues.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Are you kidding me?

9:01 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Jeri, you are so right. Motive? They had planned all this time to put in BR. Their search for a new super was all a show. They were never going to look elsewhere, thats obvious.

Lynn

7:28 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Finally a decision made with common sense in the wake of the financial state of the school district and state. Everyone that disagrees should reach into their own pocket and waste money to conduct a search to find someone that hasnt worked in this district. Now is not the time to be careless and wasteful with money. We have great schools and I don't understand the need for all this nonsense.

Reply

All 4 Kids

8:06 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

I too was at that meeting last night and I agree with "Concerned Parent" over the way the community conducted themselves. I was appalled at the way some of them were acting. We were there to show support for our kids and their schools....not start a war with the Board. I agree with Joe also on how they hired Ms. Rains. I do believe she is perfectly qualified and I am not for an all expense search, however, there should have been at least some kind of search. If she were the best candidate out of all applicants, then so be it, but no search??? That makes no sense. I would also like to say that I am highly disappointed in the amount of community members that showed up. If you took the teachers, administrative and support staffs out of the room...that left very few of us parents. Although, it was a good showing, it still should have been more. everyone sho has an opinion one way or another over this whole thing should have been there to express that opinion! You say you support your school but then don't show up for important meetings. I'm just sayin......

Reply
Comment_arrow

Are you kidding me?

9:10 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

All 4 Kids, there was no search, because this is what they had planned since they FORCED OUT KP. Make sense?

honesty

8:23 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Maybe community members seemed a little disrespectful because they are finally seeing what our board is doing. Why ask the community what they want and then do something underhanded. Residents need to be more aware of the motives of the people in office. Next elections for members should be interesting!!!!!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Are you kidding me?

9:10 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Bravo Honesty! "True Colors" are coming out! Taxpayers is this district need to pay attention, this is going to get interesting!

Comment_arrow

Ready for Change

2:11 pm on Friday, December 16, 2011

Not everyone in the community was against hiring Barb Rains. I think it was a good idea. Why waste thousands of dollars on a search. At least with Mrs. Rains you have a proven track record. Are you kidding me....KP was not forced out! He quit and I am glad he did!!

informed

8:58 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Well, Honesty - Stacey Borgens, Joy Murphy and Mary Kenny were completely honest with the community, they just didn't agree with you and a few others in attendence. They want to keep Barb Rains and the three ladies listed many many reasons for their decision - that to me is NOT underhanded!

Reply

Parents

9:14 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Trust me , we will be heard in the next election. This board needs to realize they were elected by the people.

Reply

honesty

9:22 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Honest with the community??? Really? Then why didnt they listen to us? I am sure you are one of the people who hangs with them in the bars after meetings so be real for a minute. They are so professional!

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Joe Vince

12:41 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

@Are you kidding me?:

I deleted your comments because this comments section is not here for unfounded accusations about people's personal life. Comment and debate all you like on the issues, but leave the thinly veiled allegations out.

Joe Vince
Local editor, Frankfort

Comment_arrow

suspicious thoughts

5:53 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

adults in a bar!? how dare they! REALLY!? I'm sorry adults are allowed to go to a bar to have a drink no matter what their job, position, or profession. I am a teacher in another district (thank goodness) and we go out occasionally after work as co workers to enjoy each other's company. Some of us drink, some of us don't. Does it matter? NO! the school board members are professional adults, and allowed to do as they please. Cheers!

Comment_arrow

Ready for Change

2:24 pm on Friday, December 16, 2011

Honesty, They didn't listen to you! Stop saying us! I live in the community and I agree with their decisions, they listened to me. Why do you think everyone agrees with what you think? Oh and I don't hang out with anyone in any bars so don't even go there. As an adult, you should know by now that you don't always get to have things your way. All this drama...... alluding to motives , hanging out in bars, and statements like "this is going to get interesting"..... PLEASE

Outraged

9:28 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

All, you want to talk about unprofessionalism? How professional was it to ask Beth Lind to educate the board on the Advisory time at SHJH and then turn it in to a personal discussion about 1 board member's own child? And how professional was it to pound the gavel and ask the public to stop speaking when you don't like what they are saying?

Reply

informed

9:36 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Honesty, REALLY??? Some public comments encouraged them to do a search, other were fine keeping Barb Rains.

Were does it say the Summit Hill School District 161 Board of Education HAS to listen to you? You and your friends sounded /and still sound like a bunch of bullies. Keep trying, I doubt you can bully Borgens, Murphy and Kenny.

Reply

Parents

9:57 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Sounds to me like the board only consists of Borgens, Murphy and Kenny. Did everybody else forget about the other board members.Oh yeah, one of them had trouble staying awake during the meeting last night too. The only reason they are feeling bullied is because they are getting questioned on their ways of doing business and they are too unprofessional to know how to handle it.

Reply

Parents

10:09 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

This has absolutely nothing to do with being friends with anybody. All it has to do with is the fact that the board did not post the job opening like they do for every other job that becomes available and then go thru the interview process. When they shirk their responsibilities as a board member to follow protocol, they should expect to be questioned. It is really that simple.

Reply

Frank

10:17 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

It is obvious to see that "Concerned Parent is a friend to one or all of the board members. I was at last nights meeting, as well as, Tuesday nights meeting. It was clear to me why such anger was displayed at the board meetings. The board picked Rains because she is a friend and ally to the members, a pick from the outside could bring in someone who will not simply roll over to the boards decisions. The board will now fill in a vacant position, most likely another friend will be picked, in a time frame that allows few applicants. I was proud of the way people were acting, taking a stand on their childrens future. I was more embarassed by the boards 11:30 p.m cowardly decision to elect a new superintendent. Now Barb Rains could be a great superintendent, but with no other competition, we don't know if there was a better choice. I feel like I'm back, living in Chicago, with the politics going on here. Yes we have great schools, but with this boards decisions, things can change. I don't have the answers on what to do, but I do know that closing schools will increase class sizes. I also know by statistics, that increasing class sizes will have a negative impact on the children.

Reply
Comment_arrow

suspicious thoughts

4:30 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Barb Raines a friend to board members? ha! far from it. Barb raines is a tough lady who will make the decisions needed and will not be swayed by the board. She will not simpy roll over, she's a very fair and full forced individual who has a 2 year contract to prove it. I do believe she will step up into the position fully knowing what this district is dealing with and do a great job. Friend? NO, professional? YES!

Comment_arrow

taxpayer

10:02 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Frank,
Are you forgetting when Pain was around and was/is good chums with Doyle, Macek and Balcerzak. They didn't care what the community thought or wanted. I feel that they voted the way Keith wanted and rolled over for him. Ms. Rains has no connection to these Board members and seems to me that she has the district and our children in her best interest. If you give her a chance, you might just be suprised at how smart and educated she is. I think she will make the right decisions for our children and not what the Board demands. Hey maybe if Doyle is lucky, he will get one of his chums back on the board so he can continue where he left off.

Parents

10:33 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Concerned Parent- I do not know either how it was done in the past. If it was done that way then it has been done wrong all along. Just because it was done wrong in the past does not mean we should just continue it then...How do we know we are better off now when we do not know what else is out there. It is very shortsighted to say the least. I understand that you do not have all the facts and neitgher do I, however it is becoming very clear that the board does not have all the facts either becuase they did not do their due diligence. Plain and simple.

Reply

Citizen

10:53 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

My first question to the board, is why did you ask for community input? The community made it perfectly clear they wanted you to do a Superintendent search, yet you chose to hire Barb Rains. Where is Barb Rains resume? What are her certifications, experience? The board made this a circus by having a Town Hall meetings, teacher and parent surveys, then ignoring the wishes of community. One last thing, Mr Perros said something about the budget crisis being related to rising salaries. In the current budget salaries and benefits account for over 20 million, of that teacher salaries account for close to 13 million. Did the board not realize they are scheduled for 5% increase? If they did, how could they have allowed deficit spending this school year? If salaries and benefits account for close 80% of our district operating budget, the only way to balance the budget is to cut some salary (=larger class size).

Reply

Parents

10:57 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

It is also clear that this is exactly what 3 of the board members wanted from the start. Why didn't they post the opening as soon as Keith Pain resigned 6 months ago ? They knew that if they waited till the last minute they would have no other choice but to do what they wanted from the start. I really feel bad for Barb Rains because the board is putting her thru this for not doing their job.

Reply

All 4 Kids

11:04 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Ya know what....this is ALL getting ridiculous!! We are all supposed to be on the same side here. 1st of all...to accuse the board of hanging out in bars (or anyone that supports the board) is ridiculously childish. Really??? Come on people. We're not in High School anymore. Grow up! 2nd....As most parents said last night, 100% of the community will not be happy with decisions made. Barb Rains was voted in as Superintendant. It's done. Let's move on. We have a huge fight ahead of us to keep our schools open and I for one think that at the moment, that is much more important. No matter who was elected into the Supt. position, they still have to deal with this deficit and possible school closings. Did they do their due dilligence by hiring BR?? If she's qualified, which apparantly she is from what I have read & understand, then yes, they did. Being in 3 schools in this District has shown me that there are not enough volunteers to help at different school sponsored events. But boy does everyone like to complain when something isn't right. You want your voice to really be heard?? Then do something about it!! Put your name in for the open Board spot. Don't be an all talk no action person. All I am hearing on this comment page is alot of talk. How about some real ideas on how to make things work?? We ALL want whats best for our kids but all everyone is doing is picking at each other or at the board. Come on guys...let's band together on this!

Reply

All 4 Kids

11:08 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

And as for "Are you Kidding Me"....I do not believe anyone forced KP out! I believe he got his money and ditched. Search or no search, the decision is done. Move on to the more pressing issue and quit the mud slinging!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Are you kidding me?

6:27 pm on Friday, December 16, 2011

All, believe what you want, and NO, not taking orders from you! I'll say what ever I want and more...

Parents

11:30 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

How can we move on to the budget decisions when we cannot trust that our voice will be heard then either. Do you really mean band together or just bow down to the boards decisions every time ??They have showed that they will do whatever they want. Trust me, people will run for this open board position. We will also remember come election time as well.

Reply

Parents

12:01 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

You think last nights turnout was impressive, wait untill you see the turnout at the next election. We will be heard one way or another

Reply

Lynn

12:05 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Why don't we leave the playground fighting to the preschoolers and stop insulting and insinuating and get to the matter at hand our kids, class sizes, closing of schools and a quality education. Everyone is not going to agree with everything it is how you deal with the desicions and move on that shows who the real adults are that have our kids futures in mind.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Are you kidding me?

6:29 pm on Friday, December 16, 2011

Lynn, I cannot agree more! But what we witnessed the other night at the board meeting this crap is not gona stop anytime soon, sorry to say.

Lynn

12:11 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

The patch needs to get rid of the comment section I for one am embarrassed at the behavior!

Reply

get real

1:04 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Where has this so called "concerned community " been before this? Isn't this what the past board did too? Where was the concern when right before the election we were told we were fine with the money our school district had? Where ws everyone when the oLd board voted to extend Pain's contract AND give him a pay raise.Why did some tell us we had the money when we did not! Let's give Barb Rains a chance. At least I know she is ready to listen not just to the parents but the students too.

Reply

Outraged

1:18 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

This nothing agaisnt Barb. I, for one, fully intend to give her a chance and support her as best as I can. Again, people are upset with the board and their refusal to consider those suggestioms that were contrary to what they already had in mind! I am also ashamed of myself for not getting involved sooner however I will not make that mistake again. It is time for our district to set aside our differences and pull together to find a way to avoid school closings.

Reply

All 4 Kids

1:40 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

I also agree with Lynn! "Parents", I mean exactly what I said...Band together to support our schools!! Whether BR is in charge or someone else, we have a problem here. Just like with the President of the US...the new guys is left with old guys mess and will have to dig his way out. Well, that's what we have here. I have no ulterior motive for saying "band together"...I don't "bow down" to anyone! Shouldn't we, as a community already be banded togehter?? According to these coments, the so-called community is more like a lynch mob. I want my son to go Arbury Hills next year like he should be. Period!! I want the reachers in both those schools to keep their jobs. Period! I do not want larger class sizes and I do NOT want my child bussed to the other end of the District when I likve down the street for a wonderful school! Get a grip people! We need to fight to keep these schools open!! I sure hope that our kids don't learn from the bullish behavior that is going on in the comment section. Everyone has their opinion. everyone THINKS their opinion is the right one. But we have one common ground here...keeping the schools open.

Reply
Comment_arrow

suspicious thoughts

4:45 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

you want your child to go to Arbury next year, are you willing then to pay a higher enrollment fee to keep the school open? or would you protest that too? the children are all bussed to Rogus K, and Mary Drew, and Summit Hill so why does that even matter if Arbury closes your child would be bussed? 7 years ago the grade schools class sizes were in the upper 20's and nobody complained so a slightly larger class size is not going to matter much, it's alled adjusting. The teachers will be employed at the other school to accomodate the class sizes and some teachers will be dismissed due to budget regarless if the school closes it happens all the time. Opinions are one thing, be ready to back it up with logic and fact.

get real

2:47 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

I had to deal with Pain a few times. What ever experience he had sure didn't help!! I have dealt with Rains and had a much better experience.Does the community not realize the old board did the same thing! They did not listen to the community either. As I have said, put personal issues aside and do what is best for the students.. However not everyone is going to agree what is best. As for school closing I am mad that ta man stood up and said when the did the zoning 4 years ago they knew this would happen. Why didn't they express that then so we could be prepared.

Reply

Rose C

4:42 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Outraged did you read that the board was in closed session for 90 mins last night? I find it hard to believe that they didn't discuss community input at all. Did you not hear that Dr. Wylie & other very qualified professionals recommended that Mrs. Rains be appointed? They are members of the community too. Or was the board supposed to ignore their educated opinions? It's easy to sit in the audience you have your friends, whispering, you can play angry birds &only check into the converstaion when it suits you. And I have to ask, are any of you nay-sayers paying attention to the positive changes that were made over the last 6 months? Being a board member is an unpaid position - they are expected to make the best decisions with the information they are given. I think this board had 6 months to watch Mrs. Rain's performance as interim super, if she hadn't been getting the job done, I think the 6 board members would've been looking elsewhere in Sept. I hope as we go forward people who actually care about the district come to the meetings & then share the facts with the rest of the community rather than the lies & half truths that were circling this past week.

Reply

Rose C

4:42 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Also, you don't need to wait until election day-there's an open position on the board right now. Any takers? I doubt it, because it would take commitment and you wouldn't get the chance to complain. After last night - I'm shocked that there aren't more open seats, I wouldn't want to put up with your crap - Outraged, Are you kidding me, parents & Frank.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Frank

8:29 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

I can state my opinion, I wouldn't call that putting up with crap. I never tried to bully anyone, but if provoked enough I can hold my own. You have your opinion and I have mine.

Frustrated

5:25 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

It's not that I think they were underhanded so much as unprofessional. Maybe Barb is the best candidate out there for the position but maybe she isn't. We will never know because the board never gave us the opportunity to figure that out. I reserve my right to form any judgment on Barb. I truly hope she does a great job. But I don't see how anyone can argue that she is the best one out there when her experience is in human resources and community relations. She has no experience as an administrator nor in an elementary classroom. Mary said that she's done a great job over the last six months, but who wouldn't if they knew how much was at stake. We didn't have to hire a search firm to try to find other candidates. They could have formed a committee of professionals (some with hiring experience and some with educational experience) to handle the initial screening and interviewing. At the very least, they could have posted the position on the website. What extra cost would that be to taxpayers? At least it would show that they tried. On the Patch's website, of the people surveyed 87% said they didn't want Barb as superintendent. It's frustrating when so many people speak out and the board doesn't listen. They should have gone through the process.

Reply

All 4 Kids

5:27 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Suspicious Thoughts...First of all you don't know me and you have no idea where my kid goes to school now. I'm sure everyone will adjust if we have to. What I am saying is that we shouldn't have to. We love our schools, we love the closeness of them and the teachers that are teaching them. Transporation for all these extra kids is going to cost alot of money as well. No matter how you look at it, we are going to either be paying higher fees or higher taxes. There is no way around it. I live down the street from a great school and I want it to stay open. PERIOD!! I'm sorry that everyone else's OPINIONS don't match up with yours. You can't please everyone so why don't you quit nitpicking at everyones comments? You have such a strong OPINION on things...run for the open board seat. I'm trying to be a voice of reason among all the bickering and your basically telling me to just suck it up and send my kid to who knows where. Shame on you. You obviously do not have the KIDS best interest at heart. Also, Suspicious Mind, I thought I'd share the definition of "Opinion" with you taken straight out of the dictionary: Opinion - A belief NOT based on a certainty but on what seems true or probable. So, therefore, we have our OPINIONS and don't need to back them up. You certainly don't back your opinions up. And "Seriously?".....RIGHT ON!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

suspicious thoughts

6:39 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

6:36 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

you stated that you want your child to go to Arbury next year like he should, and that you didn't want him bussed to the other end of the district, teachers to keep their jobs, and you don't want larger class sizes. I simply responded not with my opinion but with facts of the matter. My opinion is you are missing the point of certain minor things don't really matter however when looking at the whole picture regarding the budget the things I stated were fact of what is to come. The cost of the busses is minute compared to the cost of keeping the smaller schools open. Your child would be bussed eventually in his lifetime so what's the big deal if he's bussed if the school closes. Your reasons why you want the school to remain open have nothing to do with the district problem. I'm not nitpicking or stating my opinion so no need to give a definition, just trying to help you see the logic and facts of why the school should close. By you saying I don't back up my opinions is hilarious seeing as how I didn't state any. So relax, I wasn't attacking you and you took what I said the wrong way. Let's see when the school closes how the parents will band together like you stated they should. Much love to you and I hope you are not overly sensitive to this comment too.

Taxed enough

5:52 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

I have an issue on what has been going on lately. I received an e-mail from Mr. Macek and Mrs. Glawe. I have never communicated with them personally so they would not have had access to my e-mail. I feel that they may have used their positions on the park district board and the Summit Hill Foundation to send out e-mails regarding what was happening with the hiring of the superintendent. When I give out my e-mail to organizations I trust it will be used for information and updates on those organizations and not using it to "get their message across". . Didn't Mr. Macek lose in the last election? Didn't Mrs. Glawe lose in the election before that? She never even ran for the board in the first place and was appointed. I really question their motives and will be calling those organizations to remove me from their email lists. I am well informed on what is going on because I do attend the meetings and don't need to hear their opinions. I can figure it out all on my own.

Reply
Comment_arrow

informed

8:11 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

I thought it was great when the board president stole Glawe's thunder when she
tried to run her own meeting last night, how disrespectful! Kudos to Ms. Kenny for abruptly squashing Glawe's behavior before there was a huge riot with this rowdy crowd. Glawe's bahavior seemed to be premediated,I'm all for people speaking their mind, although, I thought she was extremely unprofessional and uncalled for.
I'm sure the small peanut gallery will support her, but the behavior they displayed was NO better. Now I'm hearing Glawe is using the SHEF's email address's for her own personal gain.

Comment_arrow

taxpayer

10:20 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Funny because I don't know them from adam and I also received emails from them. The things that make you go "hmmmm". I didn't realize that the FSPD was allowed to give my emil out to solicitors.

Comment_arrow

Are you kidding me?

6:33 pm on Friday, December 16, 2011

I think Mary Kenny made a idot of herself, and so did everyone at the meeting. Poor Denise Lenz had to tell Mary to let Rebecca speak. Were we all at the same meeting @informed????

Disappointed

5:57 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

I am pleased with the way SH161 has done things. The school system has been very good for our family of four children. I do not know Barb Rains, and I will support her because its the right thing to do. We need her to succeed in pulling us through the current financial situation. But I do not understand why the position was not posted. Parents only want the best qualified person for the position. If that person is Barb Rains, then that is who we want running our district. The Board did the community a disservice by not seeking other potential candidates. No excuses. Using the 'short time frame' excuse implies poor management of the issue. If the Board members were unwilling to go through the hiring process because it was too difficult, then its time to move on. This is what you sign on for when you seek the position. I am very disappointed that the families living in this school district will not have the opportunity to have qualified candidates compete for this important position. We'll never know.....
and thats just not right!

Reply

sam

7:00 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

I also received the emails from Dave Macek and Rebecca Glawe. I no longer have children in school in this district. After reading all of these comments, I can see why there is a behavioral/bullying problem. Children learn what they live.

Reply

All 4 Kids

7:01 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Suspicious Minds....my apologies to you, I had you confused with someone elses posts. I am big enough to admit I made a mistake. But yes, I am overly sensitive to things because these are my children and my $$ at stake. My reasons for wanting the school to stay open reach alot further then what I mentioned. I know exactly what is going on, I am not an idiot. Anytime you close a school it is bad for a community, the district and the real estate market. I simply stated about bussing because expensive transportation will have to be involved. Not to mention starting and ending times. Who wants their 5 year olds coming home at 4 p.m.? The point I have been trying to make all day is that we need to figure out a way to keep them open. Nobody wants any school to close, for financial reasons especially...it doesn't say much about how our District handles things. So, yes, I am oversensitive to this issue. I care about my kids....sue me!! I care about where the hell 2 million dollars disappeared to. I care about the teachers, and the schools and the community that I have lived in for the past 16 years!! So forgive me if I get annoyed at the bickering and nitpicking and whatever, I thought we were a commnity looking to solve a problem, not point fingers and trash talk people. What's done is done....let's find a way to fix it is what I have been trying to say. Much love to you too Suspicious Minds....Merry Christmas!

Reply
Comment_arrow

informed

7:47 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Last year when "the old board", past Supt. and the finance dir. said no budget cuts needed during 2012-2013 which is on podcast from a workshop held in Feb. I heard over and over things were looking up....obviously. they lied! 2.5 shortfall doesn't happen overnight.

Although, this community should keep in mind this was said at a Feb. workshop and just so happened April was the school board election. Last night I heard one month reserves....where the hell did all the money go?

Citizen

9:03 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Why didn't "the old board" as you call it do the 8th grade math and determine that our payroll would be 1.3 million higher than it was 2 years ago (plus an increase in benefits) ? Lenz / Kenny / Murphy & Doyle were all on the board, Also, I thought it was terrible that Mrs Kenny cut of Mrs Glawe, why can't she have her 5 min ?. Lastly I was very disturbed when Kenny and Murphy jumped all over Beth Lind, (we will miss her when seeks employment in a new district for the 2012-13 school year) Kudos's to Mrs Coughlin for letting them know what an outstanding administrator she is

Reply
Comment_arrow

informed

9:31 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

We wouldn't be in this position if the board that was in place in 2008 didn't give the farm away with a 6/6/5/5/5 salary increase that expires in 2013...wasn't Sean Doyle, Dave macek, Ken Balcersak, Rebecca Glawe, Dee Molinara, Cindy Bonsani and Mary Kenny the members that voted for this outrageous salary increase....and now Macek and Glawe have the nerve to try to bully this board and put this community in "a temporary" panic mode. We need to panic about the financial situation and let's not forget they Glawe and macek had a chance to keep the district financially sound instead giving away the farm..

get real

9:11 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Everyone keeps talking about the board not l;istening to the community. Sure there was alot of people at the meeting last night. we have how many families in the district? I am sure we didn't even have 1/8 of the communtiy there.So please don't say yhe board did not listen to the community.

Reply

get real

9:19 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

I wish I could of stayed to listen to Lind talk about advisory. I have had children in Summit Hill and still do. I never knew in advisory they teach. Why are they being taught or coached for the ISATS? Isn't suppose to be from what they already have been taught? I thank the board member for sharing with us her experience with her daughter. It means she is these type of things in high school and they definitely do not use them as grades.

Reply

All 4 Kids

9:22 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

get real is right. As I stated earlier, if you took the teachers (who were there to make sure they'll have a job next year), the administrators and support staff out of the room...there would have been empty seats. That's sad.

Reply

Lynn

9:33 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Informed you are correct have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!

Reply

Citizen

10:03 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

to Informed - you are correct, our teachers must be great negotiators, because they got a great contract from the "old board" (although Mary Kenny defended it by saying our teachers were underpaid), but that doesn't excuse the fact that Lenz / Murphy / Kenny & Doyle ( and our business manager) should have seen this coming!!! Anyone can see they dropped the ball on this one.
to Get Real- please go back and listen to the pod-cast, I'm pretty sure you'll change your mind about the Advisory periods, I felt they were trying to embarrass Mrs Lind. If they have a problem with way this period is being used they should first discuss this with her immediate supervisors -Mrs Rains & Mr Martin. Good luck to Mrs Rains, I really hope she can lead us through this difficult time

Reply
Comment_arrow

informed

7:31 am on Friday, December 16, 2011

Citizen - Obviously, "Advisory" as it is is not what the board was lead to believe that it is. All the board was asking was don't call it something that it isn't. It sounds like she switches this class every year. The other question was how are you supporting students that are not doing well with the coach book. Ms. Lind could have clarified their questions with accurate information and not take offense she is making over $120,000. In the real world if your boss has questions and concerns during a presentations they must answer the question. It sounded like true concerns from the Board President and Vice President who does she think she is to ignore questions. TOUGH is she was on the spot, that's crap. I found out that many of the concerns were coming from parents who have the same concerns as those two board members. I hope Ms. Murphy and Ms. Kenny follow up and find out and bring this information to the board because I have heard every teachers is doing something different and the misinformation Ms. Lind was trying to pulloff they were on to it. "The performance" she put on was uncalled for I felt is was similiar the Rebecca Glawe. Ms. lind's attitude made it seem like they were stupid questions...as a parent I believe they were NOT stupid. If Beth Lind leaves in 2012 - 2013 that will be her decision, obviously you can tell how well she works together with he board with the attitude she had with them over some concerns with a program.

informed

7:52 am on Friday, December 16, 2011

Citizen, How does Ms. Lind deal with parent issues if this is the way she treats the board?

Reply

Citizen

9:38 am on Friday, December 16, 2011

Informed - I have dealt with Ms Lind and always found he to be extremely professional. I live in the real world and my supervisor would never call me out like that in a public forum. In a private or internal meeting - yes. If parents have concerns about the Advisory period they should be taking them to Lind, Martin & Rains, not running to our school board members.
Our administrators are the education experts- not our board members. If Kenny, Murphy or any other board members have issues with this class period they should take their concerns to Rains and Martin.
In my opinion, this board tends to micro-manage the district. The board of education should make the policy, and the superintendent implements it.

Reply

informed

10:27 am on Friday, December 16, 2011

Board members took the proper channel. Come on, Ms. Lind was not sitting a chair in the back of the room being "called out". It was an agenda item, obviously there must have been a reason why it was on the agenda. (possibly for the board to get a handle on a program that seems to change year after year after year....as Ms. Lind explained) Personally she seemed as confused as the two board members. I have been to other board meetings and have heard board members ask many questions from the items that were on the agenda and never saw such a response like they were being attack. I have heard many different questions discussed on many different subjects from Spec. Ed. to finance to educational issues, and so on.

Oh, by the way, Ms. Lind asked "does the board have any questions?" Shame on them for having a few!

If Mrs. Lind is SO professional why did she act so unprofessionally when questioned about educational issues. The questions asked were NOT awful, Mrs. Lind seems to not like being questioned!

What a joke! Anytime the board questions something they are called "micromanagers". Remember the buck stops with the board. Some board members don't have any questions and some board members do!

We have a 2.5 million dollar shortfall. If board members start asking the bus. manager questions will that be considered micromanaging. I believe if the board were doing there job over the past few years we wouldn't have built what we didn't need.

Reply

Citizen

12:29 pm on Friday, December 16, 2011

Informed, this will be my last response, the fact that an item is on the agenda really has no bearing, nor does Ms Lind's salary, or some peoples perception about what the Advisory period is or is not accomplishing. An item like this should be taken care of by the superintendent and / or the assistant superintendent, it falls under curriculum. When the board addresses issues like this- it's micro-managing!

Now the budget- that is the boards responsibility!! I realize they were saddled with a 30+ % increase in teacher salary over a 5 year period, but I am willing to bet each member has known about the budget crisis for quite sometime. Why wasn't a committee put together months ago to begin addressing this? Mrs Murphy said in April she is “scared for what is down the road” Now in December we are scrambling to cut 2.5 million. So far this board seems to be reactive rather than proactive.

Reply

get real

3:53 pm on Friday, December 16, 2011

I too have had to deal or try to deal with Lind. It is like talking to a wall. She hears what she wants too and sees what she wants too. She thinks her school is perfect the way it is, kind of sounds like Pain.

Reply

Are you kidding me?

6:47 pm on Friday, December 16, 2011

get real, I have NEVER had that impression from Mrs. Lind, she has always been professional and positive. She told you her school is perfect? I dought that very much. Oh and your bringing up Pain again...let it go, not working.

Reply
Comment_arrow

get real

12:52 am on Saturday, December 17, 2011

oh are you defending Lind? You must be a friend of hers. Isn't that what people are saying if you defend the board. Yes I am bringing up Pain again because she was/is part of the whole "Pain group" Are you?. I am glad she was at least positive and professional for you. Personally I think she would make a good politician, like Pain. Oops didn't mean to bring him up again.

informed

8:20 pm on Friday, December 16, 2011

Are you kidding me? is Sean William

Reply

elise Mcdonald

10:56 am on Saturday, December 17, 2011

I am not a fan of any of our principals but I do support them! The board was very underhanded in the last meeting. They ask for public opinion when they already know what they are planning on doing. Unappropriate relationships between board members and union members is obvious in frankfort. How long before they hire their partners as principals??

Reply
Comment_arrow

informed

4:25 pm on Saturday, December 17, 2011

Elise mcDonald, Underhanded? I haven't heard ANY negative comments regarding Barb's ability to lead this district into the right direction. Where have ALL of you been for the last 6-7 months since she took over after Keith Pain abruptly left this board in limbo.

Get over it, it's over now!

How long before they hire their partners as principals?? How long did it take Keith Pain and Sean William Doyle to get all of their people in the right places. It's been 6 months haven't heard of any unethical behavior regarding employment. If anything I have heard more positive comments then when the old board and keith pain were in power.

Principal's that work hard and choose to stay we will probably see them back next year, principal's that leave i believe had NO intentions of working with this new board and Barb Rains. It's their choice, they need to adjust accordingly....nobody walk on water....

get real

1:38 pm on Saturday, December 17, 2011

I can not support people I do not believe in. Where you at the board meetings about a year ago? They too were very undrehanded. The community spoke but they also had there minds made up. Do not these volunteer board members have a right to become friends with wohmever they want? Look at the world in jobs, sports etc.. Alot of positions are by who you know. If it is true that "the community " has spoken and want new board members then we will have ALOT of candidates on the ballott!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Parents

3:46 pm on Saturday, December 17, 2011

Nobody said they can't have a realationship with whoever they want, but this case is a serious conflict of interest with the teacher contract renewal coming up next year.

Comment_arrow

informed

4:28 pm on Saturday, December 17, 2011

I hope to see new faces on the board that can truly put the time in that some of these board members put into this unpaid position.

get real

10:49 pm on Saturday, December 17, 2011

So no one can be friends with the Union president? These are not paying positions. I am very good friends with my boss so does that mean she should not let me still work at the company or not give me a good review? How do you know what kind of relationship they have? You must know them personally.

Reply

informed

1:01 pm on Sunday, December 18, 2011

Teachers should be happy the union and board are getting along...it seems to me that many of the board members care a great deal about our teachers. JUst go to board meeting/podcast and listen to what is discussed.

When is the union election? if he/she is not UnionPresident or chooses not toss their name in, realisticly that will free him/her up to take an administrative position, which in many districts is a natural progression. I know people from Homer and told me the principal from Indian Trail was a teacher, then a union President ,and know a principal. Is anything wrong with that?

Reply

taxpayer

3:27 pm on Tuesday, December 20, 2011

RHLW,
You seriously need to grow up. Honestly now, This whole.....who is sleeping with who has been mentioned time and time again by YOU!!! Unless you are snuggling with them while they are "sleeping together", its all hearsay. For the record, I do not know anyone on the Board personally. Your posts make you sound like you are a bitter person for one reason or another, and seem to always try and stir up dirt. Seriously, why don't you run for the Board..........OR are you already a Board member?

Reply

get real

4:42 pm on Tuesday, December 20, 2011

I am so tired of hearing the same story. Unless you have talked to the board member personally you do not know what is going on in his/her life. Once again these members are not being payed. I think they do the best they can and give more of their time then we realize. I f you are a board member then work with theat oerson and stop causing problems.

Reply

get real

4:42 pm on Tuesday, December 20, 2011

I am so tired of hearing the same story. Unless you have talked to the board member personally you do not know what is going on in his/her life. Once again these members are not being payed. I think they do the best they can and give more of their time then we realize. I f you are a board member then work with theat oerson and stop causing problems.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ready for Change

9:44 pm on Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Informed, Why shouldn't the Board members care a great deal about our teachers? Where is the problem with that? Shouldn't they care? Who spends all day with our children? Not the administrators or anyone else. The teachers spend more time with some kids than their own parents do. Who knows better if their needs are being met and if systems that are in place truly are working. Maybe the Board wants the truth and not just some political talking in circles or numbers that look good on paper but don't reflect the truth of the situation. Listen to the teachers you might learn something.

get real

10:43 pm on Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Anyone who says the board does not care about what the teachers say surely must be mistaken. What about when the teachers at a school were asking for another social worker?? I believe two board members (you know who) voted against it. What about when teachers have to handle the behavorial problems (which takes away teaching time of the other students) because adminstration can't be bothered. The board IS for the teachers-well most of the board at least. It is the administration who talks in circles and does whatever to make it look good on paper.

Reply

get real

11:08 am on Thursday, January 5, 2012

The board appoints a new member and stil not happy? First of all who doesn't gossip? Second I heard rumors too(won't say names) was going to say eveything the board wanted to hear and then turn on them. I am assuming those who are still complaining put their names in to run on the board, right?

Reply

informed

12:22 pm on Thursday, January 5, 2012

Denise Wildevelde was NOT on the board last spring. RHLW your and your friends are the ones spreading all sorts of rumors.

Oh well Maybe she wanted Keith Pain gone, well so did many others that live in this community, haven't heard many community members that miss him.
She has a right to voice her opinion truth or not....look you and your friends lie through your teeth every time you post something. Shame on you.

Reply

get real

2:17 pm on Thursday, January 5, 2012

Blah blah blah. You must be a board member to know all of this or you know a board memberwho is gossiping. Sounds like to me alot of people like to spread rumorsand gossip on this comment board. RHLW, did you run for board or try to fill the position? You seem to know alot about everyone.

Reply

informed

2:53 pm on Thursday, January 5, 2012

If your buddies are going to watch Summit Hill school board so closely (like with a fine tooth comb), RHLW let's start attending LW 210 meetings, township meetings, frankfort Square park district meetings, 843 meetings,
wildcat football/cheerleading meetings, etc...oh the very best would be attending those wonderful FSBL meetings...that would be great and then maybe we can go out afterwards for free drinks on the baseball board..i believe I heard from someone Dave Macek wouldn't miss a free round of drinks...why? in my opinion too many men in the community think Macek walks on water and they continue to follow him...guess what he doesn't! Talk about disfunctional boards...let's start talking. What has that man ever fought for? So many people are sick of the politics that go along with their children playing baseball, football/cheerleading it is so sad the favoritism that is displayed throughout our community....not just with Summit Hill district 161 but the FSBL and Wildcats football/cheerleading. These are the same men that come to District 161 school board meetings and act like a bunch of bullies....trying to intimidate even with very little information/often inaccurate. As a community we should start watching these men alittle closer....are you sure you know where your money is going? Start paying attention, you will be surprised.

Reply

informed

2:53 pm on Thursday, January 5, 2012

If your buddies are going to watch Summit Hill school board so closely (like with a fine tooth comb), RHLW let's start attending LW 210 meetings, township meetings, frankfort Square park district meetings, 843 meetings,
wildcat football/cheerleading meetings, etc...oh the very best would be attending those wonderful FSBL meetings...that would be great and then maybe we can go out afterwards for free drinks on the baseball board..i believe I heard from someone Dave Macek wouldn't miss a free round of drinks...why? in my opinion too many men in the community think Macek walks on water and they continue to follow him...guess what he doesn't! Talk about disfunctional boards...let's start talking. What has that man ever fought for? So many people are sick of the politics that go along with their children playing baseball, football/cheerleading it is so sad the favoritism that is displayed throughout our community....not just with Summit Hill district 161 but the FSBL and Wildcats football/cheerleading. These are the same men that come to District 161 school board meetings and act like a bunch of bullies....trying to intimidate even with very little information/often inaccurate. As a community we should start watching these men alittle closer....are you sure you know where your money is going? Start paying attention, you will be surprised.

Reply

get real

3:41 pm on Thursday, January 5, 2012

RHLW, you really like to name call and put people down, don't you?! All I am saying is actions speak louder then words. So instead of name calling and putting down, get on the board and see how good you are at it.
Also I think you missed the all point to Informed. There is favoritism and "who you know" everywhere, not just the school board.HMMM!!! who may not be smart?

Reply

informed

3:41 pm on Thursday, January 5, 2012

Who would a board member get fired?...or is this another one of your rumors.
By the way my girls were great athletes...FSBL or Wildcat Football/Cheerleading
crushed many hearts of the children in our community, simply because there dad wasn't in the "in" crowd or drinking buddies with someone from the "in" crowd.

Reply

get real

7:03 pm on Thursday, January 5, 2012

I have reread Informed comments, no where does it say anything about his/her kids but kids in general. He /she was just comparing. At least he/she cares about the kids. RHLW, you just want to knock everyone done and try to start trouble. I think everyone knows who needs to get fired at Summit Hill. Get the people who only want things to look good on paper and not really is what happening,OUT

Reply

get real

7:06 pm on Thursday, January 5, 2012

What facts? rumor? How do you have proof? Did you hire an outside firm to investigate?

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Joe Vince

12:04 am on Friday, January 6, 2012

Readers:

This is a general reminder: Keep your comments civil. Personal shots accomplish nothing when discussing these types of issues. They come across as an attempt to mask an inability to make an effective argument.

Everyone participating here is clearly passionate about these issues, and I encourage you to debate with as much passion as you can muster. Just do so respectfully, treating the people you disagree with the same way you'd like them to treat you.

And that goes double for unfounded rumors and speculation. Spouting off about personal relationships or making thinly veiled accusations about wrong-doing without any facts is, quite frankly, irresponsible, unmitigated crap. If you can't--or are unwilling to--back up your claims with attribution or without hiding behind a pseudonym, then keep it to yourself. How would you view the reporting on Patch if I posted scandalous stories based solely on "the word on the street" and then didn't even use my real name? And what if those stories were about you? Making sure my reporting is accurate and responsible is something I take very seriously. I don't expect commenters to do the type of research I do (that's my job, and it's one of the reasons, I hope, why you keep reading), but they should consider the gravity of their remarks before making wild allegations.

OK, lecture over. We now return you to your regularly scheduled commenting, already in progress.

Joe Vince
Local editor, Frankfort

Reply

Leave a comment