.

Should Local Elected Officials Have Term Limits?

Tinley Park voters will voice whether the village should impose local term limits in a November referendum. Should your town consider term limits in the future?

Every four years we have a chance to hit the ballot box and cast a referendum on certain candidates in office. Have they done a good enough job during the last term to warrant re-election? 

But term limits can change that process entirely, presenting new candidates and pushing out existing officials. Voters in Tinley Park will have the chance in November to vote on whether elected officials in the village should face term limits in the future.

Should your town have term limits? VOTE in the poll below! 

. He said he got the idea after noticing the Village Board's "lack of interest" in residents' complaints in 2010. 

The question doesn’t specify how many terms officials should be limited to, but Eberhardt said he personally feels two terms is enough.

After Franklin Roosevelt broke George Washington's tradition and served 3+ terms, Congress ratified the 22nd Amendment to limit the president to two four-year terms. 

Should that be the case locally? Mayor Ed Zabrocki, who has been in office since 1981, said elections are natural term limits for officials who aren’t doing their jobs.

“It’s incumbent on elected officials to do a good job,” he said. “Turnout at municipal elections is very small, so it doesn’t take a lot of votes to make a difference in a local election.

“Term limits limit a person’s democratic process by denying them the opportunity to vote for someone,” he said.

.

There are inherent advantages for incumbents when it comes to getting elected. They often have greater visibility and experience running a campaign; the re-election rate for incumbents is generally through the roof. 

But municipal term limits are very rare. Philadelphia and New York have them, for example, but few others do.

Besides limiting a person's democratic process, as Zabrocki said term limits can do, residents run the risk of losing institutional knowledge and insight that some long-standing board members have. 

On a local level, are term limits worth it? Or can residents rely on voting someone out of office when they don't like the job he or she is doing?

—Bob Bong contributed to this article.

Dianna August 26, 2012 at 04:48 PM
Yes to term limits.
BUTCH September 14, 2012 at 03:30 PM
term limits yes one term no term for any Mormon wearing a yarmulke at a wailing wall or supersessionism Fundy nor the celebrity preachers climate deniers and everyone on the payroll of EXXON and HELLIBURTON and the poisonous coal lobby
Dean Casper September 14, 2012 at 04:06 PM
Religious bigotry should have no place on Patch
BUTCH September 14, 2012 at 05:05 PM
I am a believer in the constitution and in Benjamin Franklin ideas and idealism there should be no store front tax exempt churches, PREDATOR PRIESTS and their disgusting BISHOPS paying hush money and blessing the TPARTY nor extortionist celebrity preachers or a cultist MISSIONARY BISHOP who wants to be COMMANDER in CHIEF while wearing magical and sacred underwear I think it should be on every network and news outlet. this guy should be CIC on some planet other than earth
BUTCH September 15, 2012 at 04:39 AM
The Bishop Missionary who was prostelyzing to the decadent Christians in France during the Viet War had a Mormon moment in Tampa how do these PTSD or no combat Legion old men even invite him to their convention the same way that all u middle class that are making 200,000 -250,000 a year he is not out of touch u wannabe 1% are

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »